Jan 202012
 

It’s a no brainer really. People hate hypocrites and Newt is the lying sack of sheep dung that thinks with his dick instead of his brain. No one with any scruples will want this man to become President of the United States. Because it goes to his character, and that bag o’ shit doesn’t have the right to claim foul when it comes to questioning his character. His character has been put on display and he has no fucking comeback for it, other than to blame the media for making it an issue.

And he didn’t do it just to one wife, he did it to two of them. He also did it whilst pointing his pudgy finger at Bill Clinton for doing the same damn thing.

No one likes a liar and a hypocrite. Well, maybe the extreme rightwingers do, but the vast majority of voters will not in the general election.

Then, he pulled a Palin and blamed the Media for bringing it up in Thursday nights GOP Clownfest. Like they were the ones that did the philandering. How ridiculous and near-sighted can that damn jackass be? The other media panelists, in a HuffPo piece, split on backing the CNN moderator John King for asking the question:

The other panelists mostly backed King up. David Gergen called Gingrich’s infidelity issues “the elephant in the room,” and said King had a “duty” to ask the question. Ari Fleischer, George W. Bush’s former press secretary, was not so charitable.

“I don’t think it was the right sequence,” he said, explaining that he thought the question was too geared towards political junkies and not enough towards a broader audience interested in bigger issues.

King parried the disagreement with aplomb. “This is a debatable question,” he said. “…I completely understand and respect those who disagree.”

Meanwhile, that fucknut Gingrich can lie his ass off and play the race card in a state that still flies the Confederate Flag over it’s state capitol. As Alternet called a recent, so-called debate there, a Racism-Fest. And ironically on the celebration of MLK Day.

Below is Rachel Maddow’s take on the dog-whistles used by Eye-of-Newt and others during a Faux Noise Debate that obviously had a fan-friendly crowd as the GOP racists received lots and lots of applause, and a couple of standing ovations to boot I believe:

Did you take the time to watch it? If so, did it disgust you? It should. These are Americans m’dear reader.

Yes, I have moved from fucking-around on two spouses to being a blatant racist but it’s all connected as it shows Eye-of-Newt’s character, or to be more precise, his lack of character.

One must also remember, he resigned in disgrace, ole Newty did. If his screwing-over two of this three wives doesn’t do him in..the rest of his history certainly will as Obama surely will bring it up if a miracle occurs and Eye-of-Newt is the GOP nominee for President.

Newt has a lot more baggage to sweat than his three marriages. Wonder if he will try to blame all the rest of his fuckery on the Media too…because there are plenty of reasons that current and former colleagues have come out against that worthless fuck being the GOP chosen one for this years Presidential election.

Dusty

I am a..brown Cali bitch that is quite the opinionated,political, pain-in-the-ass, in your face kinda girl that also loves baseball and music to a fault. Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.--Albert Einstein-*

  8 Responses to “Why Newt’s philandering does matter. It’s called character.”

  1. No one with any scruples will want this man to become President of the United States.

    Except the gooper base, following its prime directive: If it pisses off liberals, they’re all for it.
    ~

    • We do the same thing…if the GOP is for it..we are against it. But… I believe we have facts on our side..unlike the GOP and their base of fucknuts.

    • No one with any scruples will want this man to become President of the United States.

      Except the gooper base, following its prime directive: If it pisses off liberals, they’re all for it.

      you haven’t given an example of anyone with scruples thudner.

  2. //No one with any scruples//

    oh oh I had some scruples once. They were really good with melted butter … and I had a side of baked potato and some clam chowder and….. oh oh, never mind… those were scallops. But I did have some Fig Newtons…. they were stale and I will never buy them again. Just saying

  3. Gingrich is an egotistical, selfish POS, a black hole for ethics, a serial adulterer and vicious bully. His campaign has been run like a Keystone Kops slapstick comedy.

    I sooo hope he gets the GOP nomination. He’s the perfect conservative Republican candidate. I just wish he would choose Bachmann to be his No. 2.

    • I just wish he would choose Bachmann to be his No. 2. Lawd, I almost died laughing at that S.W.,literally, I was taking a sip of water at the time..damn near kilt me. ;)

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>